My long time companion:
I have another one, looks quite alike, but spines are shorter and flowers are more at purple side of spectrum. No flower yet
And something I got last year and thought its some echinopsis or something:
I hope you don't mind me uploading to Imageshack for ID, pics can be resized there, so those willing to help can take a better look.
Thanks
Two lobivias(?) for ID
Forum rules
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
For the discussion of topics related to the conservation, cultivation, propagation, exhibition & science of cacti & other succulents only.
Please respect all forum members opinions and if you can't make a civil reply, don't reply!
- AnTTun
- BCSS Member
- Posts: 2882
- https://www.behance.net/kuchnie-warszawa
- Joined: 14 Jul 2010
- Branch: None
- Country: Croatia
- Contact:
Two lobivias(?) for ID
TTcacti - C&S database software - http://www.ttimpact.hr/anttun/
- Phil_SK
- Moderator
- Posts: 5457
- Joined: 11 Jan 2007
- Branch: MACCLESFIELD & EAST CHESHIRE
- Country: UK
- Role within the BCSS: Forum Moderator
- Location: Stockport, UK
Re: Two lobivias(?) for ID
Perhaps hertrichiana for the first, though I don't say that confidently. The second looks like a Chamaecereus hybrid.
Phil Crewe, BCSS 38143. Mostly S. American cacti, esp. Lobivia, Sulcorebutia and little Opuntia
Re: Two lobivias(?) for ID
I thought the second was a Chamaecereus hybrid too
this is also a Chamaecereus hybrid
so you can see the similarities
this is also a Chamaecereus hybrid
so you can see the similarities
Rev Joy
enjoying keeping Mamms, Eurphorbias and wee spiny beasties
Bradford UK
BCSS number 49386
enjoying keeping Mamms, Eurphorbias and wee spiny beasties
Bradford UK
BCSS number 49386